Demographics details for Kingsland, GA vs Murfreesboro, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingsland, GA vs Murfreesboro, TN.
Data | Kingsland | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,896 | 162,398 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 31.5 years |
Median Income | $73,839 | $70,451 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Kingsland vs Murfreesboro
- The population in Murfreesboro is higher at 162,398, compared to 19,896 in Kingsland.
- Residents in Kingsland have a higher median age of 33.1 years compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
- Kingsland has a higher median income of $73,839 compared to $70,451 in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingsland at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Murfreesboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Murfreesboro at 10%, compared to 9% in Kingsland.
- The unemployment rate in Kingsland is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Kingsland vs Murfreesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kingsland | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 17 |
White | 60 | 66 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 8 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingsland vs Murfreesboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingsland at 21% compared to 17% in Murfreesboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Murfreesboro at 66% compared to 60% in Kingsland.
- In Murfreesboro, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Kingsland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kingsland at 8% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingsland at 9% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingsland and Murfreesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kingsland | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Depression | 21.8% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 15.5% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingsland vs Murfreesboro
- In Murfreesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.8% in Kingsland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Murfreesboro at 26.5% versus 21.8% in Kingsland.
- Murfreesboro has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 17.3% in Kingsland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingsland at 16.1% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingsland at 36.1% compared to 34.8% in Murfreesboro.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Kingsland and Murfreesboro at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kingsland | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (51) | 0.6% (920) |
High School Diploma | 15.6% (3,105) | 10.7% (17,362) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (1,175) | 6.2% (10,101) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (2,616) | 23.4% (38,019) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingsland vs Murfreesboro
- In Murfreesboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Kingsland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsland hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 10.7% in Murfreesboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Murfreesboro at 6.2%, compared to 5.9% in Kingsland.
- In Murfreesboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 13.1% in Kingsland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.