Demographics details for Kingsland, GA vs Lake arthur, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingsland, GA vs Lake arthur, LA.
Data | Kingsland | Lake arthur |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,896 | 2,594 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 36.0 years |
Median Income | $73,839 | $43,625 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Kingsland vs Lake arthur
- In Kingsland, the population is higher at 19,896, compared to 2,594 in Lake arthur.
- The median age in Lake arthur is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 33.1 years in Kingsland.
- Kingsland has a higher median income of $73,839 compared to $43,625 in Lake arthur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingsland at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Lake arthur.
- The poverty level is higher in Lake arthur at 13%, compared to 9% in Kingsland.
- Lake arthur has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Kingsland.
Demographics
Demographics Kingsland vs Lake arthur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kingsland | Lake arthur |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 7 |
White | 60 | 83 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingsland vs Lake arthur
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingsland at 21% compared to 7% in Lake arthur.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake arthur at 83% compared to 60% in Kingsland.
- The Asian population is larger in Kingsland at 2% compared to 0% in Lake arthur.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kingsland at 8% compared to 7% in Lake arthur.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingsland at 9% compared to 3% in Lake arthur.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingsland and Lake arthur at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kingsland | Lake arthur |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 14.5% |
Depression | 21.8% | 28.6% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 41.6% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingsland vs Lake arthur
- In Lake arthur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 16.8% in Kingsland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lake arthur at 28.6% versus 21.8% in Kingsland.
- Lake arthur has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 17.3% in Kingsland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake arthur at 18.2% compared to 16.1% in Kingsland.
- Lake arthur has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 36.1% in Kingsland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake arthur at 24.0% compared to 9.0% in Kingsland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kingsland | Lake arthur |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (51) | 1.5% (39) |
High School Diploma | 15.6% (3,105) | 18.9% (490) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (1,175) | 35.5% (920) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (2,616) | 5.7% (149) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingsland vs Lake arthur
- In Lake arthur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in Kingsland.
- In Lake arthur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 15.6% in Kingsland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lake arthur at 35.5%, compared to 5.9% in Kingsland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 5.7% in Lake arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.