Demographics details for Kingsland, GA vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingsland, GA vs Cedar park, TX.
| Data | Kingsland | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,896 | 77,642 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $73,839 | $118,903 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Kingsland vs Cedar park
- The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 19,896 in Kingsland.
- The median age in Cedar park is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 33.1 years in Kingsland.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $73,839 in Kingsland.
- In Cedar park, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 36.0% in Kingsland.
- Kingsland has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Kingsland.
Demographics
Demographics Kingsland vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingsland | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | 3 |
| White | 60 | 55 |
| Asian | 2 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingsland vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingsland at 21% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
- Kingsland has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 2% in Kingsland.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 8% in Kingsland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar park at 10%, compared to 9% in Kingsland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingsland and Cedar park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingsland | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingsland vs Cedar park
- More residents in Kingsland report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar park at 24.1% versus 21.8% in Kingsland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingsland at 17.3% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 16.1% in Kingsland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingsland at 36.1% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingsland at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingsland | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (51) | 0.4% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (3,105) | 8.9% (6,896) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (1,175) | 4.1% (3,156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (2,616) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingsland vs Cedar park
- In Cedar park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Kingsland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsland hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- More residents in Kingsland have less than a high school education at 5.9% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 13.1% in Kingsland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.