Demographics details for Kings mountain, NC vs Stillwater, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kings mountain, NC vs Stillwater, MN.
| Data | Kings mountain | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,638 | 19,276 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 41.8 years |
| Median Income | $45,301 | $107,986 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kings mountain vs Stillwater
- The population in Stillwater is higher at 19,276, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
- The median age in Stillwater is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 41.5 years in Kings mountain.
- Stillwater has a higher median income of $107,986, compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- Kings mountain has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The unemployment rate in Kings mountain is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Kings mountain vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kings mountain | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 3 |
| White | 68 | 83 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kings mountain vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kings mountain at 25% compared to 3% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stillwater at 83% compared to 68% in Kings mountain.
- Both Kings mountain and Stillwater have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 5%, compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kings mountain and Stillwater at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kings mountain | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 20.9% | 13.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kings mountain vs Stillwater
- More residents in Kings mountain report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.5% in Stillwater.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kings mountain at 25.7% compared to 23.3% in Stillwater.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kings mountain at 20.9% compared to 13.0% in Stillwater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stillwater at 21.5% compared to 16.3% in Kings mountain.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kings mountain at 38.0% compared to 31.5% in Stillwater.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kings mountain at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kings mountain | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (43) | 1.0% (186) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (2,528) | 11.9% (2,297) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (2,071) | 4.0% (778) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (1,353) | 34.4% (6,634) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kings mountain vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kings mountain hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 11.9% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Kings mountain have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.