Demographics details for Kings mountain, NC vs Socorro, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kings mountain, NC vs Socorro, TX.
Data | Kings mountain | Socorro |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,638 | 37,772 |
Median Age | 41.5 years | 35.6 years |
Median Income | $45,301 | $47,649 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Kings mountain vs Socorro
- The population in Socorro is higher at 37,772, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
- Residents in Kings mountain have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 35.6 years in Socorro.
- Socorro has a higher median income of $47,649, compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- In Socorro, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- The poverty level is higher in Socorro at 13%, compared to 11% in Kings mountain.
- Socorro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.2% in Kings mountain.
Demographics
Demographics Kings mountain vs Socorro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kings mountain | Socorro |
---|---|---|
Black | 25 | Data is updating |
White | 68 | -22 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 91 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 29 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Kings mountain vs Socorro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kings mountain at 25% compared to 0% in Socorro.
- Kings mountain has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to -22% in Socorro.
- The Asian population is larger in Kings mountain at 2% compared to 0% in Socorro.
- Socorro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 91%, compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Socorro at 29%, compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- In Socorro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Kings mountain.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kings mountain | Socorro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 15.6% |
Depression | 25.7% | 23.2% |
Smoking | 20.9% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 38.0% | 40.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kings mountain vs Socorro
- In Socorro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.3% in Kings mountain.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kings mountain at 25.7% compared to 23.2% in Socorro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kings mountain at 20.9% compared to 18.0% in Socorro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kings mountain at 16.3% compared to 14.6% in Socorro.
- Socorro has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Kings mountain and Socorro at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kings mountain | Socorro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (43) | 3.3% (1,237) |
High School Diploma | 21.7% (2,528) | 12.3% (4,639) |
Less than High School | 17.8% (2,071) | 38.6% (14,584) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (1,353) | 5.8% (2,188) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kings mountain vs Socorro
- In Socorro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kings mountain hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 12.3% in Socorro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Socorro at 38.6%, compared to 17.8% in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kings mountain hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 5.8% in Socorro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.