Demographics details for Kings mountain, NC vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kings mountain, NC vs Friendship, WI.
| Data | Kings mountain | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,638 | 681 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $45,301 | $45,208 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Kings mountain vs Friendship
- In Kings mountain, the population is higher at 11,638, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 41.5 years in Kings mountain.
- Kings mountain has a higher median income of $45,301 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- In Friendship, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- The poverty level is higher in Friendship at 12%, compared to 11% in Kings mountain.
- Friendship has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Kings mountain.
Demographics
Demographics Kings mountain vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kings mountain | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 5 |
| White | 68 | 84 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kings mountain vs Friendship
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kings mountain at 25% compared to 5% in Friendship.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to 68% in Kings mountain.
- The Asian population is larger in Kings mountain at 2% compared to 0% in Friendship.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kings mountain at 2% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friendship at 9%, compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- In Friendship, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kings mountain.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kings mountain | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 20.9% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kings mountain vs Friendship
- More residents in Kings mountain report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kings mountain at 25.7% compared to 24.3% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 20.9% in Kings mountain.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 16.3% in Kings mountain.
- Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kings mountain at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Friendship.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kings mountain | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (43) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (2,528) | 26.9% (183) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (2,071) | 26.0% (177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (1,353) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kings mountain vs Friendship
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Kings mountain and Friendship at 0.4%.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 21.7% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 17.8% in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kings mountain hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.