Demographics details for Kingman, AZ vs Springbrook, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingman, AZ vs Springbrook, WI.
| Data | Kingman | Springbrook |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,918 | 74 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $56,360 | $41,875 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Kingman vs Springbrook
- In Kingman, the population is higher at 34,918, compared to 74 in Springbrook.
- The median age in Springbrook is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 42.1 years in Kingman.
- Kingman has a higher median income of $56,360 compared to $41,875 in Springbrook.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingman at 37.0% compared to 19.0% in Springbrook.
- Kingman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Springbrook.
- The unemployment rate in Kingman is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Springbrook.
Demographics
Demographics Kingman vs Springbrook provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingman | Springbrook |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 72 | 81 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingman vs Springbrook
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingman at 2% compared to 0% in Springbrook.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Springbrook at 81% compared to 72% in Kingman.
- In Springbrook, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Kingman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kingman at 16% compared to 4% in Springbrook.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springbrook at 12%, compared to 7% in Kingman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Kingman at 1% compared to 0% in Springbrook.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingman | Springbrook |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 23.4% |
| Obesity | 34.5% | 32.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingman vs Springbrook
- More residents in Kingman report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 14.5% in Springbrook.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springbrook at 23.1% versus 21.2% in Kingman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingman at 19.1% compared to 15.5% in Springbrook.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Springbrook at 23.4% compared to 18.5% in Kingman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingman at 34.5% compared to 32.2% in Springbrook.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingman at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Springbrook.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingman | Springbrook |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (266) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (5,487) | 23.0% (17) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (4,744) | 5.4% (4) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (4,777) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingman vs Springbrook
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Springbrook.
- In Springbrook, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 15.7% in Kingman.
- More residents in Kingman have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 5.4% in Springbrook.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Springbrook.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.