Demographics details for Kingman, AZ vs Island park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingman, AZ vs Island park, NY.
Data | Kingman | Island park |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,918 | 4,969 |
Median Age | 42.1 years | 42.7 years |
Median Income | $56,360 | $96,875 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Kingman vs Island park
- In Kingman, the population is higher at 34,918, compared to 4,969 in Island park.
- The median age in Island park is higher at 42.7 years, compared to 42.1 years in Kingman.
- Island park has a higher median income of $96,875, compared to $56,360 in Kingman.
- In Island park, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Kingman.
- Kingman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Island park.
- Island park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Kingman.
Demographics
Demographics Kingman vs Island park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kingman | Island park |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 72 | 56 |
Asian | 2 | 4 |
Hispanic | 16 | 33 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingman vs Island park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingman at 2% compared to 1% in Island park.
- Kingman has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 56% in Island park.
- In Island park, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Kingman.
- Island park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 16% in Kingman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingman at 7% compared to 6% in Island park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Kingman at 1% compared to 0% in Island park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kingman | Island park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 14.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 9.8% |
Depression | 21.2% | 17.4% |
Smoking | 19.1% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 34.5% | 29.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingman vs Island park
- More residents in Kingman report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 14.6% in Island park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingman at 21.2% compared to 17.4% in Island park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingman at 19.1% compared to 14.1% in Island park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingman at 18.5% compared to 17.9% in Island park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingman at 34.5% compared to 29.5% in Island park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingman at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Island park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kingman | Island park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (266) | 0.5% (27) |
High School Diploma | 15.7% (5,487) | 27.9% (1,388) |
Less than High School | 13.6% (4,744) | 8.9% (443) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (4,777) | 16.5% (819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingman vs Island park
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Island park.
- In Island park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 15.7% in Kingman.
- More residents in Kingman have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 8.9% in Island park.
- In Island park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 13.7% in Kingman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.