Demographics details for Kingman, AZ vs Harrison, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingman, AZ vs Harrison, AR.
| Data | Kingman | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,918 | 13,338 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 41.8 years |
| Median Income | $56,360 | $39,677 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Kingman vs Harrison
- In Kingman, the population is higher at 34,918, compared to 13,338 in Harrison.
- Residents in Kingman have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 41.8 years in Harrison.
- Kingman has a higher median income of $56,360 compared to $39,677 in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingman at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Harrison.
- The poverty level is higher in Harrison at 15%, compared to 12% in Kingman.
- Harrison has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Kingman.
Demographics
Demographics Kingman vs Harrison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingman | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 72 | 92 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingman vs Harrison
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingman at 2% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harrison at 92% compared to 72% in Kingman.
- The Asian population is larger in Kingman at 2% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kingman at 16% compared to 4% in Harrison.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingman at 7% compared to 4% in Harrison.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Kingman at 1% compared to 0% in Harrison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingman | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 24.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 34.5% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingman vs Harrison
- In Harrison, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.2% in Kingman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harrison at 28.9% versus 21.2% in Kingman.
- Harrison has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 19.1% in Kingman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingman at 18.5% compared to 14.8% in Harrison.
- Harrison has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 34.5% in Kingman.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Kingman and Harrison at 18.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingman | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (266) | 0.9% (115) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (5,487) | 21.0% (2,807) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (4,744) | 12.5% (1,665) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (4,777) | 13.1% (1,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingman vs Harrison
- In Harrison, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Kingman.
- In Harrison, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 15.7% in Kingman.
- More residents in Kingman have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 12.5% in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 13.1% in Harrison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.