Demographics details for Kingman, AZ vs Freeland, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingman, AZ vs Freeland, WA.
Data | Kingman | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,918 | 1,894 |
Median Age | 42.1 years | 51.2 years |
Median Income | $56,360 | $89,868 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Kingman vs Freeland
- In Kingman, the population is higher at 34,918, compared to 1,894 in Freeland.
- The median age in Freeland is higher at 51.2 years, compared to 42.1 years in Kingman.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $89,868, compared to $56,360 in Kingman.
- In Freeland, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Kingman.
- Kingman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.2% in Kingman.
Demographics
Demographics Kingman vs Freeland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kingman | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 3 |
White | 72 | 86 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 16 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kingman vs Freeland
- In Freeland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Kingman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Freeland at 86% compared to 72% in Kingman.
- The Asian population is larger in Kingman at 2% compared to 1% in Freeland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kingman at 16% compared to 3% in Freeland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingman at 7% compared to 6% in Freeland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingman and Freeland at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kingman | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 9.2% |
Depression | 21.2% | 25.5% |
Smoking | 19.1% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 18.0% |
Obesity | 34.5% | 29.6% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingman vs Freeland
- More residents in Kingman report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.8% in Freeland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Freeland at 25.5% versus 21.2% in Kingman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingman at 19.1% compared to 11.8% in Freeland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingman at 18.5% compared to 18.0% in Freeland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingman at 34.5% compared to 29.6% in Freeland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Freeland at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Kingman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kingman | Freeland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (266) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.7% (5,487) | 8.1% (153) |
Less than High School | 13.6% (4,744) | 8.7% (164) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (4,777) | 28.9% (548) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingman vs Freeland
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 8.1% in Freeland.
- More residents in Kingman have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 8.7% in Freeland.
- In Freeland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 13.7% in Kingman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.