Demographics details for Kingman, AZ vs Chestnut mound, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingman, AZ vs Chestnut mound, TN.
Data | Kingman | Chestnut mound |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,918 | 215 |
Median Age | 42.1 years | 36.0 years |
Median Income | $56,360 | $50,000 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Kingman vs Chestnut mound
- In Kingman, the population is higher at 34,918, compared to 215 in Chestnut mound.
- Residents in Kingman have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 36.0 years in Chestnut mound.
- Kingman has a higher median income of $56,360 compared to $50,000 in Chestnut mound.
- In Chestnut mound, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 37.0% in Kingman.
- The poverty level is higher in Chestnut mound at 15%, compared to 12% in Kingman.
- Chestnut mound has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.2% in Kingman.
Demographics
Demographics Kingman vs Chestnut mound provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kingman | Chestnut mound |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 72 | 100 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 16 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingman vs Chestnut mound
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingman at 2% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chestnut mound at 100% compared to 72% in Kingman.
- The Asian population is larger in Kingman at 2% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kingman at 16% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingman at 7% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Kingman at 1% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kingman | Chestnut mound |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 21.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 19.1% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 34.5% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingman vs Chestnut mound
- More residents in Kingman report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingman at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingman at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingman at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingman at 34.5% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingman at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kingman | Chestnut mound |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (266) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.7% (5,487) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 13.6% (4,744) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (4,777) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingman vs Chestnut mound
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
- More residents in Kingman have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.