Demographics details for Kingman, AZ vs Chestnut mound, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kingman, AZ vs Chestnut mound, TN.

Data Kingman Chestnut mound
Population 34,918 215
Median Age 42.1 years 36.0 years
Median Income $56,360 $50,000
Married Families 37.0% 51.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.6

Population Comparison: Kingman vs Chestnut mound

  • In Kingman, the population is higher at 34,918, compared to 215 in Chestnut mound.
  • Residents in Kingman have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 36.0 years in Chestnut mound.
  • Kingman has a higher median income of $56,360 compared to $50,000 in Chestnut mound.
  • In Chestnut mound, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 37.0% in Kingman.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chestnut mound at 15%, compared to 12% in Kingman.
  • Chestnut mound has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.2% in Kingman.

Demographics

Demographics Kingman vs Chestnut mound provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kingman Chestnut mound
Black 2 Data is updating
White 72 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 16 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Kingman vs Chestnut mound

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingman at 2% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Chestnut mound at 100% compared to 72% in Kingman.
  • The Asian population is larger in Kingman at 2% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Kingman at 16% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Kingman at 7% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Kingman at 1% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kingman Chestnut mound
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.4% Data is updating%
Depression 21.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 19.1% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.5% Data is updating%
Obesity 34.5% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 18.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kingman vs Chestnut mound

  • More residents in Kingman report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Kingman at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Kingman at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Kingman at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Kingman at 34.5% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Kingman at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kingman Chestnut mound
No Schooling 0.8% (266) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.7% (5,487) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 13.6% (4,744) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.7% (4,777) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Kingman vs Chestnut mound

  • A higher percentage of residents in Kingman have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • More residents in Kingman have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.