Demographics details for Kingman, AZ vs Breckenridge, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingman, AZ vs Breckenridge, TX.
| Data | Kingman | Breckenridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,918 | 5,177 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $56,360 | $38,500 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Kingman vs Breckenridge
- In Kingman, the population is higher at 34,918, compared to 5,177 in Breckenridge.
- Residents in Kingman have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 35.1 years in Breckenridge.
- Kingman has a higher median income of $56,360 compared to $38,500 in Breckenridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingman at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Breckenridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Breckenridge at 15%, compared to 12% in Kingman.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Kingman and Breckenridge at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Kingman vs Breckenridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingman | Breckenridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 72 | 42 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 39 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kingman vs Breckenridge
- In Breckenridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Kingman.
- Kingman has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 42% in Breckenridge.
- Both Kingman and Breckenridge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Breckenridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 16% in Kingman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Breckenridge at 13%, compared to 7% in Kingman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingman and Breckenridge at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingman | Breckenridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 21.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 34.5% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingman vs Breckenridge
- In Breckenridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.2% in Kingman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Breckenridge at 25.6% versus 21.2% in Kingman.
- Breckenridge has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 19.1% in Kingman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingman at 18.5% compared to 17.5% in Breckenridge.
- Breckenridge has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 34.5% in Kingman.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Kingman and Breckenridge at 18.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingman | Breckenridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (266) | 2.4% (126) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (5,487) | 14.7% (763) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (4,744) | 26.3% (1,361) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (4,777) | 9.2% (477) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingman vs Breckenridge
- In Breckenridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.8% in Kingman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Breckenridge at 26.3%, compared to 13.6% in Kingman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 9.2% in Breckenridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.