Demographics details for Kingman, AZ vs Blairsville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingman, AZ vs Blairsville, GA.
Data | Kingman | Blairsville |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,918 | 760 |
Median Age | 42.1 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $56,360 | $21,827 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kingman vs Blairsville
- In Kingman, the population is higher at 34,918, compared to 760 in Blairsville.
- Residents in Kingman have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 38.4 years in Blairsville.
- Kingman has a higher median income of $56,360 compared to $21,827 in Blairsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingman at 37.0% compared to 30.0% in Blairsville.
- The poverty level is higher in Blairsville at 15%, compared to 12% in Kingman.
- The unemployment rate in Kingman is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Blairsville.
Demographics
Demographics Kingman vs Blairsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kingman | Blairsville |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 13 |
White | 72 | 59 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 16 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Kingman vs Blairsville
- In Blairsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 2% in Kingman.
- Kingman has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 59% in Blairsville.
- The Asian population is larger in Kingman at 2% compared to 0% in Blairsville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kingman at 16% compared to 15% in Blairsville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingman at 7% compared to 2% in Blairsville.
- In Blairsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 1% in Kingman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kingman | Blairsville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 11.6% |
Depression | 21.2% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 19.1% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 34.5% | 33.8% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingman vs Blairsville
- More residents in Kingman report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.9% in Blairsville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingman at 21.2% compared to 20.8% in Blairsville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingman at 19.1% compared to 17.5% in Blairsville.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Kingman and Blairsville at 18.5%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingman at 34.5% compared to 33.8% in Blairsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingman at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Blairsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kingman | Blairsville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (266) | 1.8% (14) |
High School Diploma | 15.7% (5,487) | 19.2% (146) |
Less than High School | 13.6% (4,744) | 35.0% (266) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (4,777) | 2.1% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingman vs Blairsville
- In Blairsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Kingman.
- In Blairsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 15.7% in Kingman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Blairsville at 35.0%, compared to 13.6% in Kingman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 2.1% in Blairsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.