Demographics details for Kingman, AZ vs Baldwin, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingman, AZ vs Baldwin, GA.
| Data | Kingman | Baldwin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,918 | 3,866 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 29.8 years |
| Median Income | $56,360 | $48,234 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Kingman vs Baldwin
- In Kingman, the population is higher at 34,918, compared to 3,866 in Baldwin.
- Residents in Kingman have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 29.8 years in Baldwin.
- Kingman has a higher median income of $56,360 compared to $48,234 in Baldwin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingman at 37.0% compared to 32.0% in Baldwin.
- The poverty level is higher in Baldwin at 15%, compared to 12% in Kingman.
- The unemployment rate in Kingman is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Baldwin.
Demographics
Demographics Kingman vs Baldwin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingman | Baldwin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 72 | 1 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 28 |
| American Indian | 1 | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Kingman vs Baldwin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingman at 2% compared to 1% in Baldwin.
- Kingman has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 1% in Baldwin.
- The Asian population is larger in Kingman at 2% compared to 1% in Baldwin.
- Baldwin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 16% in Kingman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin at 28%, compared to 7% in Kingman.
- In Baldwin, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 1% in Kingman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingman | Baldwin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 34.5% | 35.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingman vs Baldwin
- In Baldwin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.2% in Kingman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Baldwin at 23.3% versus 21.2% in Kingman.
- Baldwin has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 19.1% in Kingman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingman at 18.5% compared to 14.6% in Baldwin.
- Baldwin has higher obesity rates at 35.3% compared to 34.5% in Kingman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingman at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Baldwin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingman | Baldwin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (266) | 4.0% (155) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (5,487) | 10.6% (409) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (4,744) | 42.2% (1,633) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (4,777) | 10.1% (392) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingman vs Baldwin
- In Baldwin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.0% compared to 0.8% in Kingman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 10.6% in Baldwin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin at 42.2%, compared to 13.6% in Kingman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 10.1% in Baldwin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.