Demographics details for Kimmell, IN vs Markleeville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kimmell, IN vs Markleeville, CA.
Data | Kimmell | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Population | 453 | 163 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 64.6 years |
Median Income | $36,667 | $93,333 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 63.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Kimmell vs Markleeville
- In Kimmell, the population is higher at 453, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
- The median age in Markleeville is higher at 64.6 years, compared to 37.4 years in Kimmell.
- Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333, compared to $36,667 in Kimmell.
- In Markleeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 63.0%, compared to 30.0% in Kimmell.
- Kimmell has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- Markleeville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Kimmell.
Demographics
Demographics Kimmell vs Markleeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kimmell | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 100 | 77 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 23 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kimmell vs Markleeville
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Kimmell and Markleeville at 0%.
- Kimmell has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 77% in Markleeville.
- Both Kimmell and Markleeville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Markleeville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 0% in Kimmell.
- Both Kimmell and Markleeville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kimmell and Markleeville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kimmell | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 12.0% |
Depression | 26.2% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 39.8% | 30.0% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kimmell vs Markleeville
- In Markleeville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.7% in Kimmell.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kimmell at 26.2% compared to 23.0% in Markleeville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kimmell at 19.2% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kimmell at 17.4% compared to 17.1% in Markleeville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kimmell at 39.8% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kimmell at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Markleeville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kimmell | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 28.7% (130) | 19.6% (32) |
Less than High School | 41.5% (188) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.0% (9) | 35.6% (58) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kimmell vs Markleeville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Kimmell and Markleeville at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kimmell hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
- More residents in Kimmell have less than a high school education at 41.5% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- In Markleeville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 2.0% in Kimmell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.