Demographics details for Kimmell, IN vs Gardner, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kimmell, IN vs Gardner, MA.
Data | Kimmell | Gardner |
---|---|---|
Population | 453 | 20,902 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 45.0 years |
Median Income | $36,667 | $56,974 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Kimmell vs Gardner
- The population in Gardner is higher at 20,902, compared to 453 in Kimmell.
- The median age in Gardner is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 37.4 years in Kimmell.
- Gardner has a higher median income of $56,974, compared to $36,667 in Kimmell.
- In Gardner, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Kimmell.
- The poverty level is higher in Gardner at 9%, compared to 8% in Kimmell.
- Gardner has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.2% in Kimmell.
Demographics
Demographics Kimmell vs Gardner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kimmell | Gardner |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 100 | 82 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kimmell vs Gardner
- In Gardner, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Kimmell.
- Kimmell has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 82% in Gardner.
- In Gardner, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Kimmell.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Kimmell.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gardner at 5%, compared to 0% in Kimmell.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kimmell and Gardner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kimmell | Gardner |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 11.1% |
Depression | 26.2% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 39.8% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kimmell vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.7% in Kimmell.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kimmell at 26.2% compared to 24.4% in Gardner.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kimmell at 19.2% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 17.4% in Kimmell.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kimmell at 39.8% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kimmell at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Gardner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kimmell | Gardner |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (276) |
High School Diploma | 28.7% (130) | 21.5% (4,487) |
Less than High School | 41.5% (188) | 16.8% (3,513) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.0% (9) | 15.0% (3,133) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kimmell vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Kimmell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kimmell hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 21.5% in Gardner.
- More residents in Kimmell have less than a high school education at 41.5% compared to 16.8% in Gardner.
- In Gardner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 2.0% in Kimmell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.