Demographics details for Kilmarnock, VA vs Sweetwater, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kilmarnock, VA vs Sweetwater, TX.
| Data | Kilmarnock | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,428 | 10,408 |
| Median Age | 60.2 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $36,875 | $44,306 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Sweetwater
- The population in Sweetwater is higher at 10,408, compared to 1,428 in Kilmarnock.
- Residents in Kilmarnock have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 35.7 years in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher median income of $44,306, compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
- In Sweetwater, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 27.0% in Kilmarnock.
- The poverty level is higher in Sweetwater at 15%, compared to 11% in Kilmarnock.
- Sweetwater has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.4% in Kilmarnock.
Demographics
Demographics Kilmarnock vs Sweetwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kilmarnock | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 6 |
| White | 74 | 34 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Sweetwater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kilmarnock at 23% compared to 6% in Sweetwater.
- Kilmarnock has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 34% in Sweetwater.
- The Asian population is larger in Kilmarnock at 1% compared to 0% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sweetwater at 13%, compared to 2% in Kilmarnock.
- In Sweetwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kilmarnock | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Sweetwater
- In Sweetwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sweetwater at 24.2% versus 22.8% in Kilmarnock.
- Sweetwater has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sweetwater at 17.3% compared to 15.7% in Kilmarnock.
- Sweetwater has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 38.0% in Kilmarnock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sweetwater at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Kilmarnock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kilmarnock | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (43) | 1.9% (194) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (295) | 16.0% (1,666) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (314) | 23.1% (2,408) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (245) | 7.0% (733) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Sweetwater
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.9% in Sweetwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock hold a high school diploma at 20.7% compared to 16.0% in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sweetwater at 23.1%, compared to 22.0% in Kilmarnock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.