Demographics details for Kilmarnock, VA vs Savage, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kilmarnock, VA vs Savage, MN.
Data | Kilmarnock | Savage |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,428 | 32,893 |
Median Age | 60.2 years | 37.5 years |
Median Income | $36,875 | $123,069 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Savage
- The population in Savage is higher at 32,893, compared to 1,428 in Kilmarnock.
- Residents in Kilmarnock have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 37.5 years in Savage.
- Savage has a higher median income of $123,069, compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
- In Savage, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 27.0% in Kilmarnock.
- Kilmarnock has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 4% in Savage.
- The unemployment rate in Kilmarnock is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.3% in Savage.
Demographics
Demographics Kilmarnock vs Savage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kilmarnock | Savage |
---|---|---|
Black | 23 | 9 |
White | 74 | 74 |
Asian | 1 | 7 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Savage
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kilmarnock at 23% compared to 9% in Savage.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Kilmarnock and Savage at 74%.
- In Savage, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Kilmarnock.
- Savage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Savage at 5%, compared to 2% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kilmarnock and Savage at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kilmarnock | Savage |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 12.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 7.5% |
Depression | 22.8% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 17.1% | 12.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 38.0% | 32.4% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Savage
- More residents in Kilmarnock report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.1% in Savage.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kilmarnock at 22.8% compared to 20.5% in Savage.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kilmarnock at 17.1% compared to 12.0% in Savage.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Savage at 18.9% compared to 15.7% in Kilmarnock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kilmarnock at 38.0% compared to 32.4% in Savage.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kilmarnock at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in Savage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kilmarnock | Savage |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.0% (43) | 0.9% (303) |
High School Diploma | 20.7% (295) | 9.0% (2,949) |
Less than High School | 22.0% (314) | 3.3% (1,095) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (245) | 34.5% (11,339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Savage
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.9% in Savage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock hold a high school diploma at 20.7% compared to 9.0% in Savage.
- More residents in Kilmarnock have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 3.3% in Savage.
- In Savage, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.5% compared to 17.2% in Kilmarnock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.