Demographics details for Kilmarnock, VA vs Safford, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kilmarnock, VA vs Safford, AZ.
| Data | Kilmarnock | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,428 | 10,297 |
| Median Age | 60.2 years | 31.6 years |
| Median Income | $36,875 | $64,860 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Safford
- The population in Safford is higher at 10,297, compared to 1,428 in Kilmarnock.
- Residents in Kilmarnock have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Safford has a higher median income of $64,860, compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
- In Safford, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 27.0% in Kilmarnock.
- Kilmarnock has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Safford.
- Safford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Kilmarnock.
Demographics
Demographics Kilmarnock vs Safford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kilmarnock | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 2 |
| White | 74 | 31 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Safford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kilmarnock at 23% compared to 2% in Safford.
- Kilmarnock has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 31% in Safford.
- Both Kilmarnock and Safford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Safford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Safford at 15%, compared to 2% in Kilmarnock.
- In Safford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kilmarnock | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Safford
- In Safford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kilmarnock at 22.8% compared to 19.9% in Safford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kilmarnock at 17.1% compared to 16.6% in Safford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Safford at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Kilmarnock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kilmarnock at 38.0% compared to 35.2% in Safford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kilmarnock at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Safford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kilmarnock | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (43) | 2.7% (274) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (295) | 11.1% (1,147) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (314) | 17.7% (1,825) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (245) | 10.6% (1,092) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Safford
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 2.7% in Safford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock hold a high school diploma at 20.7% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- More residents in Kilmarnock have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 17.7% in Safford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.