Demographics details for Kilmarnock, VA vs Kent, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kilmarnock, VA vs Kent, WA.
| Data | Kilmarnock | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,428 | 134,392 |
| Median Age | 60.2 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $36,875 | $86,966 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Kent
- The population in Kent is higher at 134,392, compared to 1,428 in Kilmarnock.
- Residents in Kilmarnock have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 34.7 years in Kent.
- Kent has a higher median income of $86,966, compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
- In Kent, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 27.0% in Kilmarnock.
- Kilmarnock has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Kent.
- Kent has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.4% in Kilmarnock.
Demographics
Demographics Kilmarnock vs Kent provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kilmarnock | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 13 |
| White | 74 | 37 |
| Asian | 1 | 23 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Kent
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kilmarnock at 23% compared to 13% in Kent.
- Kilmarnock has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 37% in Kent.
- In Kent, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 1% in Kilmarnock.
- Kent has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kent at 10%, compared to 2% in Kilmarnock.
- In Kent, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kilmarnock | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Kent
- In Kent, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kent at 24.8% versus 22.8% in Kilmarnock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kilmarnock at 17.1% compared to 13.6% in Kent.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kent at 16.1% compared to 15.7% in Kilmarnock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kilmarnock at 38.0% compared to 27.2% in Kent.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kilmarnock at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Kent.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kilmarnock | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (43) | 2.1% (2,872) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (295) | 14.6% (19,603) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (314) | 12.9% (17,326) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (245) | 18.5% (24,855) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Kent
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 2.1% in Kent.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock hold a high school diploma at 20.7% compared to 14.6% in Kent.
- More residents in Kilmarnock have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 12.9% in Kent.
- In Kent, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 17.2% in Kilmarnock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.