Demographics details for Kilmarnock, VA vs Fairfield bay, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kilmarnock, VA vs Fairfield bay, AR.
| Data | Kilmarnock | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,428 | 2,152 |
| Median Age | 60.2 years | 68.2 years |
| Median Income | $36,875 | $58,750 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Fairfield bay
- The population in Fairfield bay is higher at 2,152, compared to 1,428 in Kilmarnock.
- The median age in Fairfield bay is higher at 68.2 years, compared to 60.2 years in Kilmarnock.
- Fairfield bay has a higher median income of $58,750, compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
- In Fairfield bay, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 27.0% in Kilmarnock.
- Kilmarnock has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Fairfield bay.
- Fairfield bay has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Kilmarnock.
Demographics
Demographics Kilmarnock vs Fairfield bay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kilmarnock | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 1 |
| White | 74 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Fairfield bay
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kilmarnock at 23% compared to 1% in Fairfield bay.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield bay at 86% compared to 74% in Kilmarnock.
- Both Kilmarnock and Fairfield bay have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Fairfield bay has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield bay at 5%, compared to 2% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kilmarnock and Fairfield bay at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kilmarnock | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Fairfield bay
- In Fairfield bay, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairfield bay at 27.1% versus 22.8% in Kilmarnock.
- Fairfield bay has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Kilmarnock and Fairfield bay at 15.7%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kilmarnock at 38.0% compared to 37.3% in Fairfield bay.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield bay at 32.0% compared to 19.0% in Kilmarnock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kilmarnock | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (43) | 0.2% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (295) | 24.6% (529) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (314) | 7.0% (151) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (245) | 33.9% (729) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Fairfield bay
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.2% in Fairfield bay.
- In Fairfield bay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 20.7% in Kilmarnock.
- More residents in Kilmarnock have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairfield bay.
- In Fairfield bay, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 17.2% in Kilmarnock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.