Demographics details for Kilmarnock, VA vs Confluence, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kilmarnock, VA vs Confluence, PA.
| Data | Kilmarnock | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,428 | 714 |
| Median Age | 60.2 years | 54.8 years |
| Median Income | $36,875 | $54,432 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Confluence
- In Kilmarnock, the population is higher at 1,428, compared to 714 in Confluence.
- Residents in Kilmarnock have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 54.8 years in Confluence.
- Confluence has a higher median income of $54,432, compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
- In Confluence, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 27.0% in Kilmarnock.
- Kilmarnock has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Confluence.
- Confluence has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.4% in Kilmarnock.
Demographics
Demographics Kilmarnock vs Confluence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kilmarnock | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 2 |
| White | 74 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Confluence
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kilmarnock at 23% compared to 2% in Confluence.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Confluence at 92% compared to 74% in Kilmarnock.
- The Asian population is larger in Kilmarnock at 1% compared to 0% in Confluence.
- Confluence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Confluence at 5%, compared to 2% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kilmarnock and Confluence at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kilmarnock | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Confluence
- In Confluence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Confluence at 24.3% versus 22.8% in Kilmarnock.
- Confluence has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Confluence at 18.7% compared to 15.7% in Kilmarnock.
- Confluence has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 38.0% in Kilmarnock.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Kilmarnock and Confluence at 19.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kilmarnock | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (43) | 0.3% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (295) | 30.3% (216) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (314) | 8.0% (57) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (245) | 11.5% (82) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Confluence
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.3% in Confluence.
- In Confluence, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.3% compared to 20.7% in Kilmarnock.
- More residents in Kilmarnock have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in Confluence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 11.5% in Confluence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.