Demographics details for Kilmarnock, VA vs Columbus, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kilmarnock, VA vs Columbus, MS.
| Data | Kilmarnock | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,428 | 23,273 |
| Median Age | 60.2 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $36,875 | $38,954 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Columbus
- The population in Columbus is higher at 23,273, compared to 1,428 in Kilmarnock.
- Residents in Kilmarnock have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 38.5 years in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher median income of $38,954, compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kilmarnock at 27.0% compared to 25.0% in Columbus.
- The poverty level is higher in Columbus at 19%, compared to 11% in Kilmarnock.
- Columbus has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.4% in Kilmarnock.
Demographics
Demographics Kilmarnock vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kilmarnock | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 66 |
| White | 74 | 28 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Columbus
- In Columbus, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 23% in Kilmarnock.
- Kilmarnock has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 28% in Columbus.
- In Columbus, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Kilmarnock.
- Columbus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
- Both Kilmarnock and Columbus have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kilmarnock and Columbus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kilmarnock | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 44.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Columbus
- In Columbus, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kilmarnock at 22.8% compared to 20.0% in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kilmarnock at 15.7% compared to 11.8% in Columbus.
- Columbus has higher obesity rates at 44.8% compared to 38.0% in Kilmarnock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kilmarnock at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Columbus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kilmarnock | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (43) | 1.1% (260) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (295) | 18.4% (4,272) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (314) | 11.0% (2,559) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (245) | 17.1% (3,971) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Columbus
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.1% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock hold a high school diploma at 20.7% compared to 18.4% in Columbus.
- More residents in Kilmarnock have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in Columbus.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.