Demographics details for Kilmarnock, VA vs Burnt ranch, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kilmarnock, VA vs Burnt ranch, CA.

Data Kilmarnock Burnt ranch
Population 1,428 228
Median Age 60.2 years 45.7 years
Median Income $36,875 $55,357
Married Families 27.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 11% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 7.5

Population Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Burnt ranch

  • In Kilmarnock, the population is higher at 1,428, compared to 228 in Burnt ranch.
  • Residents in Kilmarnock have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 45.7 years in Burnt ranch.
  • Burnt ranch has a higher median income of $55,357, compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
  • In Burnt ranch, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 27.0% in Kilmarnock.
  • The poverty level is higher in Burnt ranch at 13%, compared to 11% in Kilmarnock.
  • Burnt ranch has a higher unemployment rate at 7.5% compared to 3.4% in Kilmarnock.

Demographics

Demographics Kilmarnock vs Burnt ranch provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kilmarnock Burnt ranch
Black 23 Data is updating
White 74 97
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Burnt ranch

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kilmarnock at 23% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Burnt ranch at 97% compared to 74% in Kilmarnock.
  • The Asian population is larger in Kilmarnock at 1% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Kilmarnock and Burnt ranch at 0%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Kilmarnock at 2% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • In Burnt ranch, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kilmarnock Burnt ranch
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 11.1%
Depression 22.8% 20.0%
Smoking 17.1% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 19.5%
Obesity 38.0% 29.9%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Burnt ranch

  • More residents in Kilmarnock report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.6% in Burnt ranch.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Kilmarnock at 22.8% compared to 20.0% in Burnt ranch.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Kilmarnock at 17.1% compared to 14.8% in Burnt ranch.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Burnt ranch at 19.5% compared to 15.7% in Kilmarnock.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Kilmarnock at 38.0% compared to 29.9% in Burnt ranch.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Kilmarnock at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in Burnt ranch.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kilmarnock Burnt ranch
No Schooling 3.0% (43) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 20.7% (295) 11.8% (27)
Less than High School 22.0% (314) 9.6% (22)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.2% (245) 18.9% (43)

Education Levels Comparison: Kilmarnock vs Burnt ranch

  • A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Burnt ranch.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kilmarnock hold a high school diploma at 20.7% compared to 11.8% in Burnt ranch.
  • More residents in Kilmarnock have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 9.6% in Burnt ranch.
  • In Burnt ranch, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Kilmarnock.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.