Demographics details for Killeen, TX vs Washington, DC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Killeen, TX vs Washington, DC.
Data | Killeen | Washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 159,172 | 671,803 |
Median Age | 29.7 years | 34.8 years |
Median Income | $57,086 | $101,722 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Killeen vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 671,803, compared to 159,172 in Killeen.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 34.8 years, compared to 29.7 years in Killeen.
- Washington has a higher median income of $101,722, compared to $57,086 in Killeen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Killeen at 35.0% compared to 26.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 18%, compared to 15% in Killeen.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 6.0% in Killeen.
Demographics
Demographics Killeen vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Killeen | Washington |
---|---|---|
Black | 38 | 44 |
White | 18 | 34 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 27 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Killeen vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 44% compared to 38% in Killeen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 34% compared to 18% in Killeen.
- Both Killeen and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Killeen at 27% compared to 11% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Killeen at 12% compared to 7% in Washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Killeen at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Killeen | Washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 14.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 8.6% |
Depression | 22.5% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 19.1% | 12.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 20.7% |
Obesity | 42.0% | 25.6% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Killeen vs Washington
- More residents in Killeen report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.0% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Killeen at 22.5% compared to 20.1% in Washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Killeen at 19.1% compared to 12.4% in Washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 20.7% compared to 15.4% in Killeen.
- Obesity rates are higher in Killeen at 42.0% compared to 25.6% in Washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Killeen at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Killeen | Washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (1,076) | 0.9% (6,109) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (20,789) | 9.1% (61,269) |
Less than High School | 7.5% (11,859) | 6.8% (45,577) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (20,234) | 45.2% (303,532) |
Education Levels Comparison: Killeen vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Killeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Killeen hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 9.1% in Washington.
- More residents in Killeen have less than a high school education at 7.5% compared to 6.8% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.2% compared to 12.7% in Killeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.