Demographics details for Killeen, TX vs Pocahontas, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Killeen, TX vs Pocahontas, AR.
| Data | Killeen | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 159,172 | 7,546 |
| Median Age | 29.7 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $57,086 | $38,912 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Killeen vs Pocahontas
- In Killeen, the population is higher at 159,172, compared to 7,546 in Pocahontas.
- The median age in Pocahontas is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 29.7 years in Killeen.
- Killeen has a higher median income of $57,086 compared to $38,912 in Pocahontas.
- In Pocahontas, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Killeen.
- The poverty level is higher in Pocahontas at 19%, compared to 15% in Killeen.
- The unemployment rate in Killeen is higher at 6.0%, compared to 4.5% in Pocahontas.
Demographics
Demographics Killeen vs Pocahontas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Killeen | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 1 |
| White | 18 | 90 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Killeen vs Pocahontas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Killeen at 38% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pocahontas at 90% compared to 18% in Killeen.
- The Asian population is larger in Killeen at 4% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Killeen at 27% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Killeen at 12% compared to 7% in Pocahontas.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Killeen at 1% compared to 0% in Pocahontas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Killeen | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 22.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 27.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Killeen vs Pocahontas
- In Pocahontas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 18.3% in Killeen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pocahontas at 29.9% versus 22.5% in Killeen.
- Pocahontas has a higher smoking rate at 27.1% compared to 19.1% in Killeen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Killeen at 15.4% compared to 14.1% in Pocahontas.
- Pocahontas has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 42.0% in Killeen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pocahontas at 22.0% compared to 13.0% in Killeen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Killeen | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1,076) | 0.5% (40) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (20,789) | 19.8% (1,491) |
| Less than High School | 7.5% (11,859) | 15.7% (1,186) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (20,234) | 10.4% (782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Killeen vs Pocahontas
- A higher percentage of residents in Killeen have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Pocahontas.
- In Pocahontas, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 13.1% in Killeen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pocahontas at 15.7%, compared to 7.5% in Killeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Killeen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 10.4% in Pocahontas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.