Demographics details for Keyser, WV vs Tahoka, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keyser, WV vs Tahoka, TX.
Data | Keyser | Tahoka |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,849 | 2,413 |
Median Age | 39.1 years | 37.7 years |
Median Income | $46,724 | $41,282 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Keyser vs Tahoka
- In Keyser, the population is higher at 4,849, compared to 2,413 in Tahoka.
- Residents in Keyser have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 37.7 years in Tahoka.
- Keyser has a higher median income of $46,724 compared to $41,282 in Tahoka.
- In Tahoka, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 36.0% in Keyser.
- The poverty level is identical in both Keyser and Tahoka at 15%.
- The unemployment rate in Keyser is higher at 4.3%, compared to 4.1% in Tahoka.
Demographics
Demographics Keyser vs Tahoka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Keyser | Tahoka |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 95 | 28 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 48 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 22 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keyser vs Tahoka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Keyser at 4% compared to 2% in Tahoka.
- Keyser has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 28% in Tahoka.
- Both Keyser and Tahoka have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Tahoka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 0% in Keyser.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tahoka at 22%, compared to 1% in Keyser.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Keyser and Tahoka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Keyser | Tahoka |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 16.3% |
Depression | 27.3% | 24.5% |
Smoking | 20.8% | 22.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 35.3% | 43.8% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keyser vs Tahoka
- In Tahoka, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 20.0% in Keyser.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keyser at 27.3% compared to 24.5% in Tahoka.
- Tahoka has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 20.8% in Keyser.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tahoka at 15.6% compared to 14.4% in Keyser.
- Tahoka has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 35.3% in Keyser.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tahoka at 22.0% compared to 20.0% in Keyser.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Keyser | Tahoka |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (36) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (1,081) | 17.1% (412) |
Less than High School | 15.1% (734) | 28.3% (684) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.8% (914) | 13.9% (335) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keyser vs Tahoka
- In Tahoka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Keyser.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keyser hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 17.1% in Tahoka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tahoka at 28.3%, compared to 15.1% in Keyser.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keyser hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 13.9% in Tahoka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.