Demographics details for Keyser, WV vs Brockton, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keyser, WV vs Brockton, MA.
| Data | Keyser | Brockton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,849 | 104,826 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $46,724 | $74,016 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Keyser vs Brockton
- The population in Brockton is higher at 104,826, compared to 4,849 in Keyser.
- Residents in Keyser have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 36.4 years in Brockton.
- Brockton has a higher median income of $74,016, compared to $46,724 in Keyser.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Keyser at 36.0% compared to 30.0% in Brockton.
- Keyser has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Brockton.
- Brockton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.3% in Keyser.
Demographics
Demographics Keyser vs Brockton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keyser | Brockton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 40 |
| White | 95 | 30 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keyser vs Brockton
- In Brockton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 4% in Keyser.
- Keyser has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 30% in Brockton.
- In Brockton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Keyser.
- Brockton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Keyser.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brockton at 16%, compared to 1% in Keyser.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Keyser and Brockton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keyser | Brockton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 27.3% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keyser vs Brockton
- More residents in Keyser report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.4% in Brockton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keyser at 27.3% compared to 22.1% in Brockton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keyser at 20.8% compared to 19.7% in Brockton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Brockton at 16.0% compared to 14.4% in Keyser.
- Obesity rates are higher in Keyser at 35.3% compared to 33.7% in Brockton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keyser at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Brockton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keyser | Brockton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.9% (3,088) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (1,081) | 19.7% (20,641) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (734) | 15.5% (16,291) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.8% (914) | 13.4% (14,056) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keyser vs Brockton
- In Brockton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.0% in Keyser.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keyser hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 19.7% in Brockton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brockton at 15.5%, compared to 15.1% in Keyser.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keyser hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 13.4% in Brockton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.