Demographics details for Keyport, WA vs Brookhaven, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keyport, WA vs Brookhaven, GA.
| Data | Keyport | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 284 | 57,934 |
| Median Age | 57.0 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $128,221 | $114,570 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Keyport vs Brookhaven
- The population in Brookhaven is higher at 57,934, compared to 284 in Keyport.
- Residents in Keyport have a higher median age of 57.0 years compared to 34.6 years in Brookhaven.
- Keyport has a higher median income of $128,221 compared to $114,570 in Brookhaven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Keyport at 58.0% compared to 36.0% in Brookhaven.
- The poverty level is higher in Brookhaven at 7%, compared to 5% in Keyport.
- The unemployment rate in Keyport is higher at 3.0%, compared to 2.6% in Brookhaven.
Demographics
Demographics Keyport vs Brookhaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keyport | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 12 |
| White | 95 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Keyport vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 0% in Keyport.
- Keyport has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 53% in Brookhaven.
- In Brookhaven, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Keyport.
- Brookhaven has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 5% in Keyport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brookhaven at 9%, compared to 0% in Keyport.
- In Brookhaven, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Keyport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keyport | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 30.8% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keyport vs Brookhaven
- More residents in Keyport report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 13.1% in Brookhaven.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keyport at 26.4% compared to 17.8% in Brookhaven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keyport at 11.5% compared to 10.0% in Brookhaven.
- Binge drinking is more common in Keyport at 18.9% compared to 16.2% in Brookhaven.
- Obesity rates are higher in Keyport at 30.8% compared to 27.2% in Brookhaven.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keyport at 24.0% compared to 6.0% in Brookhaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keyport | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.0% (17) | 0.6% (341) |
| High School Diploma | 8.8% (25) | 5.1% (2,980) |
| Less than High School | 12.0% (34) | 8.0% (4,642) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.3% (106) | 50.3% (29,125) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keyport vs Brookhaven
- A higher percentage of residents in Keyport have no formal schooling at 6.0% compared to 0.6% in Brookhaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keyport hold a high school diploma at 8.8% compared to 5.1% in Brookhaven.
- More residents in Keyport have less than a high school education at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Brookhaven.
- In Brookhaven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 37.3% in Keyport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.