Demographics details for Keuka park, NY vs Norfolk, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keuka park, NY vs Norfolk, NE.
| Data | Keuka park | Norfolk |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,092 | 25,928 |
| Median Age | 20.4 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $79,569 | $57,479 |
| Married Families | 15.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Keuka park vs Norfolk
- The population in Norfolk is higher at 25,928, compared to 1,092 in Keuka park.
- The median age in Norfolk is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 20.4 years in Keuka park.
- Keuka park has a higher median income of $79,569 compared to $57,479 in Norfolk.
- In Norfolk, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 15.0% in Keuka park.
- Keuka park has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Norfolk.
- The unemployment rate in Keuka park is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.1% in Norfolk.
Demographics
Demographics Keuka park vs Norfolk provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keuka park | Norfolk |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 97 | 75 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Keuka park vs Norfolk
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Keuka park and Norfolk at 1%.
- Keuka park has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 75% in Norfolk.
- In Norfolk, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Keuka park.
- Norfolk has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 1% in Keuka park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Norfolk at 8%, compared to 1% in Keuka park.
- In Norfolk, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Keuka park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keuka park | Norfolk |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 29.4% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keuka park vs Norfolk
- More residents in Keuka park report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 14.3% in Norfolk.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keuka park at 25.1% compared to 18.5% in Norfolk.
- Norfolk has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Keuka park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norfolk at 21.4% compared to 17.5% in Keuka park.
- Norfolk has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 29.4% in Keuka park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keuka park at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Norfolk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keuka park | Norfolk |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (340) |
| High School Diploma | 3.6% (39) | 18.2% (4,708) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 8.1% (2,107) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (149) | 16.6% (4,308) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keuka park vs Norfolk
- In Norfolk, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Keuka park.
- In Norfolk, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 3.6% in Keuka park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Norfolk at 8.1%, compared to 0.0% in Keuka park.
- In Norfolk, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 13.6% in Keuka park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.