Demographics details for Kerman, CA vs Fremont, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kerman, CA vs Fremont, OH.
| Data | Kerman | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,208 | 15,825 |
| Median Age | 27.8 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $53,956 | $48,252 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Kerman vs Fremont
- In Kerman, the population is higher at 16,208, compared to 15,825 in Fremont.
- The median age in Fremont is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 27.8 years in Kerman.
- Kerman has a higher median income of $53,956 compared to $48,252 in Fremont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kerman at 32.0% compared to 30.0% in Fremont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fremont at 14%, compared to 12% in Kerman.
- The unemployment rate in Kerman is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.0% in Fremont.
Demographics
Demographics Kerman vs Fremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kerman | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | -12 | 68 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 81 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 22 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kerman vs Fremont
- In Fremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Kerman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fremont at 68% compared to -12% in Kerman.
- The Asian population is larger in Kerman at 7% compared to 0% in Fremont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kerman at 81% compared to 15% in Fremont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kerman at 22% compared to 8% in Fremont.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Kerman at 2% compared to 0% in Fremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kerman | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.1% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 44.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kerman vs Fremont
- More residents in Kerman report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.0% in Fremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fremont at 22.5% versus 18.0% in Kerman.
- Fremont has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 17.3% in Kerman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fremont at 17.4% compared to 13.1% in Kerman.
- Fremont has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 39.5% in Kerman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fremont at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Kerman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kerman | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.3% (694) | 0.4% (57) |
| High School Diploma | 10.4% (1,690) | 24.8% (3,931) |
| Less than High School | 45.2% (7,334) | 10.0% (1,586) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (1,177) | 10.4% (1,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kerman vs Fremont
- A higher percentage of residents in Kerman have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.4% in Fremont.
- In Fremont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 10.4% in Kerman.
- More residents in Kerman have less than a high school education at 45.2% compared to 10.0% in Fremont.
- In Fremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 7.3% in Kerman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.