Demographics details for Kerman, CA vs Fort morgan, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kerman, CA vs Fort morgan, CO.
| Data | Kerman | Fort morgan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,208 | 11,453 |
| Median Age | 27.8 years | 32.8 years |
| Median Income | $53,956 | $55,407 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Kerman vs Fort morgan
- In Kerman, the population is higher at 16,208, compared to 11,453 in Fort morgan.
- The median age in Fort morgan is higher at 32.8 years, compared to 27.8 years in Kerman.
- Fort morgan has a higher median income of $55,407, compared to $53,956 in Kerman.
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Kerman.
- Kerman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Fort morgan.
- The unemployment rate in Kerman is higher at 5.5%, compared to 2.5% in Fort morgan.
Demographics
Demographics Kerman vs Fort morgan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kerman | Fort morgan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | -12 | 16 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 81 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 22 | 23 |
| American Indian | 2 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Kerman vs Fort morgan
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Kerman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort morgan at 16% compared to -12% in Kerman.
- The Asian population is larger in Kerman at 7% compared to 0% in Fort morgan.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kerman at 81% compared to 49% in Fort morgan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort morgan at 23%, compared to 22% in Kerman.
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 2% in Kerman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kerman | Fort morgan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 18.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.1% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 29.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kerman vs Fort morgan
- More residents in Kerman report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.0% in Fort morgan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort morgan at 21.7% versus 18.0% in Kerman.
- Fort morgan has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 17.3% in Kerman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort morgan at 17.6% compared to 13.1% in Kerman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kerman at 39.5% compared to 29.3% in Fort morgan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kerman at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort morgan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kerman | Fort morgan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.3% (694) | 4.3% (496) |
| High School Diploma | 10.4% (1,690) | 16.0% (1,831) |
| Less than High School | 45.2% (7,334) | 25.8% (2,957) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (1,177) | 11.5% (1,312) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kerman vs Fort morgan
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Kerman and Fort morgan at 4.3%.
- In Fort morgan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 10.4% in Kerman.
- More residents in Kerman have less than a high school education at 45.2% compared to 25.8% in Fort morgan.
- In Fort morgan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.5% compared to 7.3% in Kerman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.