Demographics details for Kent, WA vs Ho ho kus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kent, WA vs Ho ho kus, NJ.
Data | Kent | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
Population | 134,392 | 4,216 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 43.0 years |
Median Income | $86,966 | $250,001 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Kent vs Ho ho kus
- In Kent, the population is higher at 134,392, compared to 4,216 in Ho ho kus.
- The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 34.7 years in Kent.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $86,966 in Kent.
- In Ho ho kus, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 36.0% in Kent.
- Kent has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- The unemployment rate in Kent is higher at 5.6%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics Kent vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kent | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
Black | 13 | 1 |
White | 37 | 67 |
Asian | 23 | 12 |
Hispanic | 16 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kent vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kent at 13% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ho ho kus at 67% compared to 37% in Kent.
- The Asian population is larger in Kent at 23% compared to 12% in Ho ho kus.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kent at 16% compared to 12% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kent at 10% compared to 8% in Ho ho kus.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Kent at 1% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kent | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 11.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 5.8% |
Depression | 24.8% | 16.6% |
Smoking | 13.6% | 6.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 19.6% |
Obesity | 27.2% | 21.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kent vs Ho ho kus
- More residents in Kent report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kent at 24.8% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kent at 13.6% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 16.1% in Kent.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kent at 27.2% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kent at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kent | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (2,872) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.6% (19,603) | 2.8% (117) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (17,326) | 2.0% (83) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (24,855) | 51.4% (2,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kent vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of residents in Kent have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kent hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents in Kent have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 18.5% in Kent.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.