Demographics details for Kent, WA vs Clifton hill, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kent, WA vs Clifton hill, MO.
| Data | Kent | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 134,392 | 87 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 28.3 years |
| Median Income | $86,966 | $45,500 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kent vs Clifton hill
- In Kent, the population is higher at 134,392, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
- Residents in Kent have a higher median age of 34.7 years compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
- Kent has a higher median income of $86,966 compared to $45,500 in Clifton hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kent at 36.0% compared to 31.0% in Clifton hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Clifton hill at 10%, compared to 9% in Kent.
- The unemployment rate in Kent is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.5% in Clifton hill.
Demographics
Demographics Kent vs Clifton hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kent | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | Data is updating |
| White | 37 | 94 |
| Asian | 23 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kent vs Clifton hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kent at 13% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clifton hill at 94% compared to 37% in Kent.
- The Asian population is larger in Kent at 23% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kent at 16% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kent at 10% compared to 6% in Clifton hill.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Kent at 1% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kent | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kent vs Clifton hill
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Kent and Clifton hill at 17.9%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clifton hill at 25.9% versus 24.8% in Kent.
- Clifton hill has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 13.6% in Kent.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kent at 16.1% compared to 16.0% in Clifton hill.
- Clifton hill has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 27.2% in Kent.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kent at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kent | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (2,872) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (19,603) | 26.4% (23) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (17,326) | 13.8% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (24,855) | 3.4% (3) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kent vs Clifton hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Kent have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
- In Clifton hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 14.6% in Kent.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clifton hill at 13.8%, compared to 12.9% in Kent.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kent hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.