Environment details: Kent WA
Quality concerns related to urban runoff.
Environment details: Cicero IL
Average quality; ongoing monitoring required.
Compare Environment: Kent WA vs Cicero IL
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Kent | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 590.408532 | 1473.87432 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Quality concerns related to urban runoff. | Average quality; ongoing monitoring required. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.56 | 1.86 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 21 | 56 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Kent vs Cicero
- The water quality in Cicero is superior at 5/10 compared to 4/10 in Kent.
- Cicero has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Kent.
- Air quality is better in Cicero with an average index of 1.86 compared to 1.56 in Kent.
- Cicero experiences more days with poor air quality at 56 compared to 21 in Kent.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.