Demographics details for Kennewick, WA vs Wappingers falls, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kennewick, WA vs Wappingers falls, NY.

Data Kennewick Wappingers falls
Population 84,750 6,064
Median Age 35.2 years 47.9 years
Median Income $70,429 $61,554
Married Families 37.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 11% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Kennewick vs Wappingers falls

  • In Kennewick, the population is higher at 84,750, compared to 6,064 in Wappingers falls.
  • The median age in Wappingers falls is higher at 47.9 years, compared to 35.2 years in Kennewick.
  • Kennewick has a higher median income of $70,429 compared to $61,554 in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Kennewick at 37.0% compared to 32.0% in Wappingers falls.
  • Kennewick has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Wappingers falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Kennewick is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Wappingers falls.

Demographics

Demographics Kennewick vs Wappingers falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kennewick Wappingers falls
Black 2 13
White 56 61
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 29 20
Two or More Races 10 3
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Kennewick vs Wappingers falls

  • In Wappingers falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 2% in Kennewick.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Wappingers falls at 61% compared to 56% in Kennewick.
  • In Wappingers falls, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Kennewick.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Kennewick at 29% compared to 20% in Wappingers falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Kennewick at 10% compared to 3% in Wappingers falls.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Kennewick at 1% compared to 0% in Wappingers falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kennewick Wappingers falls
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 11.9%
Depression 26.4% 22.8%
Smoking 15.8% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 16.4%
Obesity 34.1% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kennewick vs Wappingers falls

  • More residents in Kennewick report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.5% in Wappingers falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Kennewick at 26.4% compared to 22.8% in Wappingers falls.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 15.8% in Kennewick.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Kennewick at 17.1% compared to 16.4% in Wappingers falls.
  • Wappingers falls has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 34.1% in Kennewick.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Kennewick and Wappingers falls at 16.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kennewick Wappingers falls
No Schooling 1.4% (1,168) 0.9% (57)
High School Diploma 13.2% (11,198) 18.1% (1,099)
Less than High School 15.4% (13,049) 24.9% (1,511)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.9% (14,348) 14.2% (861)

Education Levels Comparison: Kennewick vs Wappingers falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Kennewick have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Wappingers falls.
  • In Wappingers falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 13.2% in Kennewick.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wappingers falls at 24.9%, compared to 15.4% in Kennewick.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kennewick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 14.2% in Wappingers falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.