Demographics details for Kennewick, WA vs Lake leelanau, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kennewick, WA vs Lake leelanau, MI.

Data Kennewick Lake leelanau
Population 84,750 165
Median Age 35.2 years 27.9 years
Median Income $70,429 $48,125
Married Families 37.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 11% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.1

Population Comparison: Kennewick vs Lake leelanau

  • In Kennewick, the population is higher at 84,750, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
  • Residents in Kennewick have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 27.9 years in Lake leelanau.
  • Kennewick has a higher median income of $70,429 compared to $48,125 in Lake leelanau.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Kennewick at 37.0% compared to 32.0% in Lake leelanau.
  • Kennewick has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Lake leelanau.
  • The unemployment rate in Kennewick is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Lake leelanau.

Demographics

Demographics Kennewick vs Lake leelanau provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kennewick Lake leelanau
Black 2 Data is updating
White 56 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 29 Data is updating
Two or More Races 10 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Kennewick vs Lake leelanau

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kennewick at 2% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake leelanau at 100% compared to 56% in Kennewick.
  • The Asian population is larger in Kennewick at 2% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Kennewick at 29% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Kennewick at 10% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Kennewick at 1% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kennewick Lake leelanau
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 8.4%
Depression 26.4% 22.5%
Smoking 15.8% 12.5%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 18.9%
Obesity 34.1% 31.7%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kennewick vs Lake leelanau

  • More residents in Kennewick report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.4% in Lake leelanau.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Kennewick at 26.4% compared to 22.5% in Lake leelanau.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Kennewick at 15.8% compared to 12.5% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 17.1% in Kennewick.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Kennewick at 34.1% compared to 31.7% in Lake leelanau.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake leelanau at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Kennewick.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kennewick Lake leelanau
No Schooling 1.4% (1,168) 2.4% (4)
High School Diploma 13.2% (11,198) 13.3% (22)
Less than High School 15.4% (13,049) 4.8% (8)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.9% (14,348) 13.9% (23)

Education Levels Comparison: Kennewick vs Lake leelanau

  • In Lake leelanau, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.4% in Kennewick.
  • In Lake leelanau, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 13.2% in Kennewick.
  • More residents in Kennewick have less than a high school education at 15.4% compared to 4.8% in Lake leelanau.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kennewick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 13.9% in Lake leelanau.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.