Demographics details for Kennewick, WA vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kennewick, WA vs Friendship, WI.
| Data | Kennewick | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 84,750 | 681 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $70,429 | $45,208 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Kennewick vs Friendship
- In Kennewick, the population is higher at 84,750, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 35.2 years in Kennewick.
- Kennewick has a higher median income of $70,429 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kennewick at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- The poverty level is higher in Friendship at 12%, compared to 11% in Kennewick.
- Friendship has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Kennewick.
Demographics
Demographics Kennewick vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kennewick | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 56 | 84 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kennewick vs Friendship
- In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Kennewick.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to 56% in Kennewick.
- The Asian population is larger in Kennewick at 2% compared to 0% in Friendship.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kennewick at 29% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kennewick at 10% compared to 9% in Friendship.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kennewick and Friendship at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kennewick | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kennewick vs Friendship
- More residents in Kennewick report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kennewick at 26.4% compared to 24.3% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 15.8% in Kennewick.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 17.1% in Kennewick.
- Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 34.1% in Kennewick.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kennewick at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Friendship.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kennewick | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (1,168) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (11,198) | 26.9% (183) |
| Less than High School | 15.4% (13,049) | 26.0% (177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (14,348) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kennewick vs Friendship
- A higher percentage of residents in Kennewick have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 13.2% in Kennewick.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 15.4% in Kennewick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kennewick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.