Demographics details for Kennewick, WA vs Earlsboro, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kennewick, WA vs Earlsboro, OK.
Data | Kennewick | Earlsboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 84,750 | 605 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 41.8 years |
Median Income | $70,429 | $64,063 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kennewick vs Earlsboro
- In Kennewick, the population is higher at 84,750, compared to 605 in Earlsboro.
- The median age in Earlsboro is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 35.2 years in Kennewick.
- Kennewick has a higher median income of $70,429 compared to $64,063 in Earlsboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kennewick at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Earlsboro.
- Kennewick has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Earlsboro.
- The unemployment rate in Kennewick is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Earlsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Kennewick vs Earlsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kennewick | Earlsboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 4 |
White | 56 | 61 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 29 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 19 |
American Indian | 1 | 9 |
Demographics Comparison: Kennewick vs Earlsboro
- In Earlsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Kennewick.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Earlsboro at 61% compared to 56% in Kennewick.
- The Asian population is larger in Kennewick at 2% compared to 0% in Earlsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kennewick at 29% compared to 7% in Earlsboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Earlsboro at 19%, compared to 10% in Kennewick.
- In Earlsboro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 9%, compared to 1% in Kennewick.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kennewick | Earlsboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.0% |
Depression | 26.4% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 15.8% | 20.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 34.1% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kennewick vs Earlsboro
- In Earlsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.7% in Kennewick.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kennewick at 26.4% compared to 24.9% in Earlsboro.
- Earlsboro has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 15.8% in Kennewick.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kennewick at 17.1% compared to 14.6% in Earlsboro.
- Earlsboro has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 34.1% in Kennewick.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Kennewick and Earlsboro at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kennewick | Earlsboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (1,168) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (11,198) | 17.2% (104) |
Less than High School | 15.4% (13,049) | 15.5% (94) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (14,348) | 11.1% (67) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kennewick vs Earlsboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Kennewick have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Earlsboro.
- In Earlsboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.2% compared to 13.2% in Kennewick.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Earlsboro at 15.5%, compared to 15.4% in Kennewick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kennewick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 11.1% in Earlsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.