Demographics details for Kenansville, NC vs Potts camp, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kenansville, NC vs Potts camp, MS.
| Data | Kenansville | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 759 | 409 |
| Median Age | 48.4 years | 45.6 years |
| Median Income | $53,750 | $21,845 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Kenansville vs Potts camp
- In Kenansville, the population is higher at 759, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
- Residents in Kenansville have a higher median age of 48.4 years compared to 45.6 years in Potts camp.
- Kenansville has a higher median income of $53,750 compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kenansville at 45.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
- The poverty level is higher in Potts camp at 25%, compared to 15% in Kenansville.
- Potts camp has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Kenansville.
Demographics
Demographics Kenansville vs Potts camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kenansville | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 13 |
| White | 61 | 80 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kenansville vs Potts camp
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kenansville at 20% compared to 13% in Potts camp.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Potts camp at 80% compared to 61% in Kenansville.
- The Asian population is larger in Kenansville at 7% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kenansville at 6% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Potts camp at 7%, compared to 6% in Kenansville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kenansville and Potts camp at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kenansville | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kenansville vs Potts camp
- More residents in Kenansville report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.4% in Potts camp.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kenansville at 24.3% compared to 23.0% in Potts camp.
- Potts camp has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 21.6% in Kenansville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kenansville at 15.6% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kenansville at 44.0% compared to 41.8% in Potts camp.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kenansville at 26.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kenansville | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (12) | 0.5% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 24.0% (182) | 13.7% (56) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (105) | 12.0% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.5% (171) | 8.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kenansville vs Potts camp
- A higher percentage of residents in Kenansville have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kenansville hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
- More residents in Kenansville have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 12.0% in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kenansville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.