Demographics details for Kenansville, NC vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kenansville, NC vs Cambridge, OH.
| Data | Kenansville | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 759 | 9,985 |
| Median Age | 48.4 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $53,750 | $39,589 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Kenansville vs Cambridge
- The population in Cambridge is higher at 9,985, compared to 759 in Kenansville.
- Residents in Kenansville have a higher median age of 48.4 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Kenansville has a higher median income of $53,750 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kenansville at 45.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 15% in Kenansville.
- Cambridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Kenansville.
Demographics
Demographics Kenansville vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kenansville | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 6 |
| White | 61 | 88 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kenansville vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kenansville at 20% compared to 6% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to 61% in Kenansville.
- The Asian population is larger in Kenansville at 7% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kenansville at 6% compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kenansville at 6% compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kenansville and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kenansville | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 26.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 46.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kenansville vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 18.4% in Kenansville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 24.3% in Kenansville.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 21.6% in Kenansville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 15.6% in Kenansville.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 44.0% in Kenansville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kenansville at 26.0% compared to 19.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kenansville | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (12) | 0.7% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 24.0% (182) | 25.1% (2,502) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (105) | 17.3% (1,732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.5% (171) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kenansville vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Kenansville have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 24.0% in Kenansville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 17.3%, compared to 13.8% in Kenansville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kenansville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.