Demographics details for Kelso, TN vs Mount vernon, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kelso, TN vs Mount vernon, KY.

Data Kelso Mount vernon
Population 185 2,472
Median Age 42.0 years 45.4 years
Median Income $60,000 $34,550
Married Families 70.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 13% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Kelso vs Mount vernon

  • The population in Mount vernon is higher at 2,472, compared to 185 in Kelso.
  • The median age in Mount vernon is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 42.0 years in Kelso.
  • Kelso has a higher median income of $60,000 compared to $34,550 in Mount vernon.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Kelso at 70.0% compared to 36.0% in Mount vernon.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mount vernon at 15%, compared to 13% in Kelso.
  • Mount vernon has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Kelso.

Demographics

Demographics Kelso vs Mount vernon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kelso Mount vernon
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 100 94
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Kelso vs Mount vernon

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Kelso and Mount vernon at 0%.
  • Kelso has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 94% in Mount vernon.
  • Both Kelso and Mount vernon have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Kelso and Mount vernon at 0%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mount vernon at 6%, compared to 0% in Kelso.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kelso and Mount vernon at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kelso Mount vernon
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.3%
Depression Data is updating% 30.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 26.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.3%
Obesity Data is updating% 43.2%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kelso vs Mount vernon

  • In Mount vernon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mount vernon at 30.7% versus 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Mount vernon has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mount vernon at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Mount vernon has higher obesity rates at 43.2% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mount vernon at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kelso Mount vernon
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (12)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.4% (431)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 32.8% (810)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.4% (183)

Education Levels Comparison: Kelso vs Mount vernon

  • In Mount vernon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • In Mount vernon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mount vernon at 32.8%, compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • In Mount vernon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.4% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.