Demographics details for Kelso, TN vs Alameda, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kelso, TN vs Alameda, CA.
| Data | Kelso | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 185 | 76,040 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $60,000 | $129,917 |
| Married Families | 70.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Kelso vs Alameda
- The population in Alameda is higher at 76,040, compared to 185 in Kelso.
- Residents in Kelso have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 40.6 years in Alameda.
- Alameda has a higher median income of $129,917, compared to $60,000 in Kelso.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kelso at 70.0% compared to 44.0% in Alameda.
- Kelso has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 7% in Alameda.
- Alameda has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Kelso.
Demographics
Demographics Kelso vs Alameda provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kelso | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 7 |
| White | 100 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 32 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kelso vs Alameda
- In Alameda, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Kelso.
- Kelso has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 37% in Alameda.
- In Alameda, the Asian population stands at 32%, greater than 0% in Kelso.
- Alameda has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Kelso.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Alameda at 12%, compared to 0% in Kelso.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kelso and Alameda at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kelso | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 8.2% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 8.9% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 23.5% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kelso vs Alameda
- In Alameda, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alameda at 17.2% versus 0.0% in Kelso.
- Alameda has a higher smoking rate at 8.9% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Alameda at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Alameda has higher obesity rates at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alameda at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kelso | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (864) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.0% (5,348) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 6.8% (5,184) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 44.5% (33,855) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kelso vs Alameda
- In Alameda, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- In Alameda, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alameda at 6.8%, compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- In Alameda, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.5% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.