Demographics details for Kelseyville, CA vs Waterproof, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kelseyville, CA vs Waterproof, LA.
| Data | Kelseyville | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,828 | 499 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $42,880 | $21,953 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 9.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Kelseyville vs Waterproof
- In Kelseyville, the population is higher at 3,828, compared to 499 in Waterproof.
- The median age in Waterproof is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 29.4 years in Kelseyville.
- Kelseyville has a higher median income of $42,880 compared to $21,953 in Waterproof.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kelseyville at 25.0% compared to 9.0% in Waterproof.
- The poverty level is higher in Waterproof at 30%, compared to 15% in Kelseyville.
- Waterproof has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Kelseyville.
Demographics
Demographics Kelseyville vs Waterproof provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kelseyville | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 103 |
| White | 14 | -12 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 68 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kelseyville vs Waterproof
- In Waterproof, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 103% compared to 2% in Kelseyville.
- Kelseyville has a higher percentage of White residents at 14% compared to -12% in Waterproof.
- In Waterproof, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Kelseyville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kelseyville at 68% compared to 0% in Waterproof.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kelseyville at 16% compared to 2% in Waterproof.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kelseyville and Waterproof at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kelseyville | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 24.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 20.0% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 33.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 53.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kelseyville vs Waterproof
- In Waterproof, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 18.2% in Kelseyville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterproof at 25.1% versus 21.5% in Kelseyville.
- Waterproof has a higher smoking rate at 33.7% compared to 16.1% in Kelseyville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kelseyville at 16.5% compared to 11.8% in Waterproof.
- Waterproof has higher obesity rates at 53.1% compared to 34.1% in Kelseyville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterproof at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Kelseyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kelseyville | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (54) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (726) | 27.7% (138) |
| Less than High School | 32.8% (1,256) | 10.6% (53) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (275) | 12.8% (64) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kelseyville vs Waterproof
- A higher percentage of residents in Kelseyville have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Waterproof.
- In Waterproof, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.7% compared to 19.0% in Kelseyville.
- More residents in Kelseyville have less than a high school education at 32.8% compared to 10.6% in Waterproof.
- In Waterproof, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 7.2% in Kelseyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.