Demographics details for Kelseyville, CA vs Wallace, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kelseyville, CA vs Wallace, SC.
| Data | Kelseyville | Wallace |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,828 | 662 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 59.8 years |
| Median Income | $42,880 | $19,423 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Kelseyville vs Wallace
- In Kelseyville, the population is higher at 3,828, compared to 662 in Wallace.
- The median age in Wallace is higher at 59.8 years, compared to 29.4 years in Kelseyville.
- Kelseyville has a higher median income of $42,880 compared to $19,423 in Wallace.
- In Wallace, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kelseyville.
- The poverty level is higher in Wallace at 22%, compared to 15% in Kelseyville.
- The unemployment rate in Kelseyville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Wallace.
Demographics
Demographics Kelseyville vs Wallace provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kelseyville | Wallace |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 42 |
| White | 14 | 44 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 68 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Kelseyville vs Wallace
- In Wallace, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 2% in Kelseyville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wallace at 44% compared to 14% in Kelseyville.
- Both Kelseyville and Wallace have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kelseyville at 68% compared to 0% in Wallace.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kelseyville at 16% compared to 10% in Wallace.
- In Wallace, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Kelseyville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kelseyville | Wallace |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 41.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kelseyville vs Wallace
- In Wallace, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.2% in Kelseyville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wallace at 22.5% versus 21.5% in Kelseyville.
- Wallace has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 16.1% in Kelseyville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kelseyville at 16.5% compared to 15.6% in Wallace.
- Wallace has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 34.1% in Kelseyville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wallace at 28.0% compared to 15.0% in Kelseyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kelseyville | Wallace |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (54) | 1.5% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (726) | 57.4% (380) |
| Less than High School | 32.8% (1,256) | 28.2% (187) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (275) | 1.1% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kelseyville vs Wallace
- In Wallace, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.4% in Kelseyville.
- In Wallace, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 57.4% compared to 19.0% in Kelseyville.
- More residents in Kelseyville have less than a high school education at 32.8% compared to 28.2% in Wallace.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kelseyville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.2% compared to 1.1% in Wallace.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.