Demographics details for Kelseyville, CA vs Stanardsville, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kelseyville, CA vs Stanardsville, VA.

Data Kelseyville Stanardsville
Population 3,828 355
Median Age 29.4 years 42.2 years
Median Income $42,880 $60,833
Married Families 25.0% 54.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Kelseyville vs Stanardsville

  • In Kelseyville, the population is higher at 3,828, compared to 355 in Stanardsville.
  • The median age in Stanardsville is higher at 42.2 years, compared to 29.4 years in Kelseyville.
  • Stanardsville has a higher median income of $60,833, compared to $42,880 in Kelseyville.
  • In Stanardsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kelseyville.
  • Kelseyville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Stanardsville.
  • The unemployment rate in Kelseyville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Stanardsville.

Demographics

Demographics Kelseyville vs Stanardsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kelseyville Stanardsville
Black 2 12
White 14 64
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 68 11
Two or More Races 16 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Kelseyville vs Stanardsville

  • In Stanardsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 2% in Kelseyville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Stanardsville at 64% compared to 14% in Kelseyville.
  • Both Kelseyville and Stanardsville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Kelseyville at 68% compared to 11% in Stanardsville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Kelseyville at 16% compared to 13% in Stanardsville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kelseyville and Stanardsville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kelseyville Stanardsville
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 12.0%
Depression 21.5% 24.1%
Smoking 16.1% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 16.5%
Obesity 34.1% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kelseyville vs Stanardsville

  • More residents in Kelseyville report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 18.0% in Stanardsville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Stanardsville at 24.1% versus 21.5% in Kelseyville.
  • Stanardsville has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 16.1% in Kelseyville.
  • Binge drinking rates are similar in both Kelseyville and Stanardsville at 16.5%.
  • Stanardsville has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 34.1% in Kelseyville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stanardsville at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in Kelseyville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kelseyville Stanardsville
No Schooling 1.4% (54) 8.7% (31)
High School Diploma 19.0% (726) 27.9% (99)
Less than High School 32.8% (1,256) 28.7% (102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.2% (275) 27.6% (98)

Education Levels Comparison: Kelseyville vs Stanardsville

  • In Stanardsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 8.7% compared to 1.4% in Kelseyville.
  • In Stanardsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 19.0% in Kelseyville.
  • More residents in Kelseyville have less than a high school education at 32.8% compared to 28.7% in Stanardsville.
  • In Stanardsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.6% compared to 7.2% in Kelseyville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.