Demographics details for Kelseyville, CA vs Milford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kelseyville, CA vs Milford, CT.
| Data | Kelseyville | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,828 | 50,471 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $42,880 | $104,503 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Kelseyville vs Milford
- The population in Milford is higher at 50,471, compared to 3,828 in Kelseyville.
- The median age in Milford is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 29.4 years in Kelseyville.
- Milford has a higher median income of $104,503, compared to $42,880 in Kelseyville.
- In Milford, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kelseyville.
- Kelseyville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Milford.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Kelseyville and Milford at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Kelseyville vs Milford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kelseyville | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 14 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 68 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kelseyville vs Milford
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Kelseyville and Milford at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Milford at 79% compared to 14% in Kelseyville.
- In Milford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Kelseyville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kelseyville at 68% compared to 8% in Milford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kelseyville at 16% compared to 6% in Milford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kelseyville and Milford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kelseyville | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 27.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kelseyville vs Milford
- More residents in Kelseyville report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 13.2% in Milford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kelseyville at 21.5% compared to 20.5% in Milford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kelseyville at 16.1% compared to 12.7% in Milford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Milford at 17.0% compared to 16.5% in Kelseyville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kelseyville at 34.1% compared to 27.5% in Milford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kelseyville at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kelseyville | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (54) | 0.7% (366) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (726) | 16.7% (8,431) |
| Less than High School | 32.8% (1,256) | 6.6% (3,307) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (275) | 36.0% (18,184) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kelseyville vs Milford
- A higher percentage of residents in Kelseyville have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Milford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kelseyville hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 16.7% in Milford.
- More residents in Kelseyville have less than a high school education at 32.8% compared to 6.6% in Milford.
- In Milford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 7.2% in Kelseyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.