Demographics details for Kelseyville, CA vs Highland, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kelseyville, CA vs Highland, KS.
| Data | Kelseyville | Highland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,828 | 915 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 20.4 years |
| Median Income | $42,880 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Kelseyville vs Highland
- In Kelseyville, the population is higher at 3,828, compared to 915 in Highland.
- Residents in Kelseyville have a higher median age of 29.4 years compared to 20.4 years in Highland.
- Highland has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $42,880 in Kelseyville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Kelseyville and Highland at 25.0%.
- Kelseyville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Highland.
- The unemployment rate in Kelseyville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Highland.
Demographics
Demographics Kelseyville vs Highland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kelseyville | Highland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 33 |
| White | 14 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 68 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kelseyville vs Highland
- In Highland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 33% compared to 2% in Kelseyville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Highland at 51% compared to 14% in Kelseyville.
- In Highland, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Kelseyville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kelseyville at 68% compared to 7% in Highland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kelseyville at 16% compared to 8% in Highland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kelseyville and Highland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kelseyville | Highland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kelseyville vs Highland
- More residents in Kelseyville report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.5% in Highland.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 21.5%.
- Highland has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 16.1% in Kelseyville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Highland at 19.2% compared to 16.5% in Kelseyville.
- Highland has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 34.1% in Kelseyville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Highland at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Kelseyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kelseyville | Highland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (54) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (726) | 7.5% (69) |
| Less than High School | 32.8% (1,256) | 6.1% (56) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (275) | 15.3% (140) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kelseyville vs Highland
- A higher percentage of residents in Kelseyville have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Highland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kelseyville hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 7.5% in Highland.
- More residents in Kelseyville have less than a high school education at 32.8% compared to 6.1% in Highland.
- In Highland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.3% compared to 7.2% in Kelseyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.