Demographics details for Keller, TX vs Stoughton, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keller, TX vs Stoughton, MA.
| Data | Keller | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,252 | 28,950 |
| Median Age | 43.3 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $162,094 | $86,000 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Keller vs Stoughton
- In Keller, the population is higher at 45,252, compared to 28,950 in Stoughton.
- Residents in Keller have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 40.0 years in Stoughton.
- Keller has a higher median income of $162,094 compared to $86,000 in Stoughton.
- In Stoughton, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 53.0% in Keller.
- The poverty level is higher in Stoughton at 5%, compared to 0% in Keller.
- The unemployment rate in Keller is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.7% in Stoughton.
Demographics
Demographics Keller vs Stoughton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keller | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 7 |
| White | 76 | 72 |
| Asian | 5 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keller vs Stoughton
- In Stoughton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 3% in Keller.
- Keller has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 72% in Stoughton.
- Both Keller and Stoughton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 5%.
- Stoughton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 10% in Keller.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keller at 6% compared to 4% in Stoughton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Keller and Stoughton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keller | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 10.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keller vs Stoughton
- More residents in Keller report poor mental health at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keller at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keller at 10.2% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Keller at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Keller at 28.6% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keller at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keller | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (183) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 7.1% (3,221) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 3.0% (1,347) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.2% (18,208) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keller vs Stoughton
- A higher percentage of residents in Keller have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keller hold a high school diploma at 7.1% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- More residents in Keller have less than a high school education at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keller hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.2% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.