Demographics details for Keller, TX vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keller, TX vs Fairburn, GA.
Data | Keller | Fairburn |
---|---|---|
Population | 45,252 | 16,956 |
Median Age | 43.3 years | 30.9 years |
Median Income | $162,094 | $67,245 |
Married Families | 53.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Keller vs Fairburn
- In Keller, the population is higher at 45,252, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- Residents in Keller have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Keller has a higher median income of $162,094 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Keller at 53.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 0% in Keller.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.8% in Keller.
Demographics
Demographics Keller vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Keller | Fairburn |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 73 |
White | 76 | 12 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keller vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 3% in Keller.
- Keller has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Keller at 5% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 10% in Keller.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keller at 6% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Keller and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Keller | Fairburn |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 10.9% |
Depression | 22.3% | 16.8% |
Smoking | 10.2% | 15.6% |
Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 28.6% | 33.7% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keller vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.9% in Keller.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keller at 22.3% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 10.2% in Keller.
- Binge drinking is more common in Keller at 19.6% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 28.6% in Keller.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Keller and Fairburn at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Keller | Fairburn |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (183) | 0.5% (78) |
High School Diploma | 7.1% (3,221) | 12.3% (2,082) |
Less than High School | 3.0% (1,347) | 5.7% (961) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.2% (18,208) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keller vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Keller.
- In Fairburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 7.1% in Keller.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairburn at 5.7%, compared to 3.0% in Keller.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keller hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.2% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.